The criteria, evidence and trade-offs behind defensible international market selection.

A public preview — roughly a quarter of the full report.
Market selection failures usually trace back to three vanity metrics: GDP, population and ease-of-doing-business. None of them predict your company's ability to win.
This paper presents the eight selection criteria that actually correlate with three-year revenue outcomes in our portfolio, and the evidence required to score each one.
GDP, population and EoDB rarely predict success.
demand depth, buyer access, competitive whitespace and five more.
from trade data to primary buyer interviews.
The full report includes the visual framework, scoring rubrics and worked examples from anonymised client engagements.
Why GDP, population and EoDB mislead.
What actually correlates with revenue outcomes.
Where to get defensible data for each criterion.
Adjusting the model for sector and stage.

Founder, Stratexecute
Ankit has led market expansion programs across cross-border engagements over the past two decades, working with founders and CXOs to convert ambition into disciplined execution. His frameworks are used inside Fortune 500 strategy teams and early-stage challengers alike.
Prior to founding Stratexecute, Ankit led international growth practices at two global consulting firms and served on the operating committees of three category leaders. He writes regularly on market entry discipline and stage-gated expansion.
Receive the full PDF of How To Select International Markets, including frameworks, scorecards and worked examples that are not in the public preview above.
No — weights should reflect the BU's offer, buyer and unit economics. The paper includes a calibration worksheet.

Compress a global longlist of twenty markets into two committed markets in under ninety days.

Design a weighted scoring model that survives boardroom scrutiny and predicts revenue.

The cross-market consumer shifts that should shape your three-year expansion plan.